Bern coat of arms and flag: city and canton not identical

Key takeaway
The canton and the city of Bern do not have the same coat of arms: under the ordinance (BSG 105.31 Art. 3 para. 2) the cantonal arms carry the crown of sovereignty, which sets them apart from the arms of the municipality of Bern with its mural crown. Anyone may use the flag (Art. 10 of the federal Act), the arms only the public body, with exceptions such as festival decorations and festival cups.
Jump to the Bern Arms Check

Same bear, two crowns: the canton wears the crown of sovereignty, the city a mural crown. Until the end of 2025 the Bernese ordinance even provided for a third bear, with no crown at all, and only one of its 26 district coats of arms showed the whole bear. Here is what the law prescribes for the bear, who may use it, and why New Bern in North Carolina received it without one detail.

· BSG 105.31 · WSchG · SRF
WhatsApp
2
crowns
of sovereignty (canton), mural (city)
1 of 26
district arms with the whole bear
version until 2025
1896
New Bern receives the arms
from a Swiss delegation
6
cases in the Arms Check
with the cited paragraph

🐻 Bern coat of arms description: what the ordinance prescribes

The cantonal government defined the Bernese bear down to its tongue, in a single sentence of the introductory ordinance (BSG 105.31 Art. 3 para. 1): shield, bend, colours, gait and three red details.

Coat of arms of the canton of Bern: black bear on a golden bend on red
Official description (blazon)

«In Rot ein goldener Schrägbalken, belegt mit einem schreitenden rot bewehrten, bezungten und gezoteten schwarzen Bären.»

Official German text, BSG 105.31 Art. 3 para. 1, version of 1 January 2026. In English, paraphrased: on red, a golden bend charged with a black bear passant, with red claws, tongue and genitals. Paraphrase: the Bernese ordinance is official only in German and French.

The technical terms, one by one
In the text (German)What it means
In RotThe shield is red.
goldener SchrägbalkenA yellow bend runs diagonally from top left (as you look at it) to bottom right.
schreitendThe bear walks, one front paw raised.
rot bewehrtRed claws.
bezungtThe tongue shows, red as well.
gezotetThe bear’s genitals are shown, red as well.

In heraldry, according to SRF, it is usual to mention the absence of this detail, not its presence. The Bernese ordinance spells it out anyway. Among the 26 district coats of arms of the version in force until 2025, the word appeared exactly twice: for the bear of Bern and for the lion of Schwarzenburg.

🏛️ Bern city coat of arms: how it differs from the canton

“Identical” is what you read almost everywhere, and it said so on this page too until November 2026. The ordinance tells them apart by the crown. Paraphrased: the cantonal arms carry the crown of sovereignty and so differ from the arms of the municipality of Bern, which has a mural crown (BSG 105.31 Art. 3 para. 2).

Three bears, three crests (BSG 105.31 Art. 3 para. 2)
Coat of armsAbove the shieldin the ordinance
Canton of Berncrown of sovereigntysince 2017, in force
Municipality (city) of Bernmural crownsince 2017, in force
District of Bernnothing above the shielduntil 31 December 2025

Until the end of 2025 the ordinance even had three bears: the earlier version also set the cantonal arms apart from those of the district of Bern, with nothing above the shield. Since 1 January 2026 the district arms are no longer in the ordinance, and Art. 3 para. 2 names only the city. Paraphrase: the Bernese ordinance is official only in German and French.

Correction
This page used to say that the arms of the city and the canton of Bern were identical. That is wrong: the ordinance expressly tells them apart by the crown.

And the Burgergemeinde, Bern’s old citizens’ corporation? The ordinance gives citizens’ communes a right to keep using the arms of a municipality they already used (Art. 8 para. 1, paraphrased). The conditions follow Art. 35 of the federal Act, and the State Chancellery is the authority that permits it (Art. 8 paras. 2 and 3).

⚖️ Using the Bern coat of arms: the Arms Check

A club may print the Bernese bear on a cup made for its festival, but not in its logo. Both rules sit in the same article of the federal Act, in different paragraphs.

Pick what you want to use the arms for. The Arms Check shows the paragraph (paraphrased in English) and the body in charge in the canton of Bern.

⚖️ Bern Arms Check by ConvivaPlus: pick a use → paragraph and body in charge

Pick a use: the paragraph of the federal Act on coats of arms and the body in charge in the canton of Bern.

What do you want to use it for?
Which coat of arms?
Reserved for the public body

A logo is not one of the cases the Act allows private persons. The arms belong to the public body and can be neither licensed nor transferred.

What the Act says (paraphrase)
Armorial Bearings Act Art. 8 para. 1:Only the public body they belong to may use the Swiss coat of arms and the arms of cantons, districts and communes, including their characteristic elements in connection with a shield and confusingly similar signs.
Armorial Bearings Act Art. 8 para. 3:These signs cannot be licensed or transferred.

Paraphrase. Swiss federal law has no official English version; the binding texts are German, French and Italian.

In charge in the canton of Bern
State Chancellery of the canton of Bern (BSG 105.31 Art. 5 para. 1)
Court for civil actions
Commercial Court of the canton of Bern, sole cantonal instance (BSG 105.31 Art. 6)
Further cases in the canton of Bern? Under Art. 8 para. 5 of the Act, cantons and communes may allow further cases. The Bernese introductory ordinance (BSG 105.31) lists none.

The Arms Check summarises the law; it is not legal advice and no substitute for an answer on a specific case. Only the official texts are binding; the body named answers questions.

Sources: Federal Act SR 232.21 (fedlex.admin.ch), version of 1 July 2025 · BSG 105.31, version of 1 January 2026 · checked 13.11.2026

verified · ConvivaPlus

🚩 Bern flag: free to use, the arms are not

Same bear, two rules: as a flag on your balcony you may show it without a permit. With a shield, as a club logo, it belongs to the public body. The Act puts flag and arms in two separate articles.

The Bernese ordinance defines the arms down to the bear’s tongue, but does not mention the flag at all. Only federal law covers it. Art. 8 protects the arms and their characteristic elements in connection with a shield. Flags fall under Art. 10, where use is the rule: it sets no permit requirement. Its limits are use that is misleading or contrary to public order, morality or the law. Turning the flag into a company sign that looks official can run into the limit of being misleading.

Federal Act Art. 10 (paraphrase)
Flags and other emblems of the Confederation, cantons, districts and communes may be used unless the use is misleading or contrary to public order, morality or applicable law. (Paraphrase. Swiss federal law has no official English version; the binding texts are German, French and Italian.)

📜 Old Bern coat of arms: what the earliest images show

The oldest depictions of the Bernese arms in the Bernese chronicles show the bear without red claws and without genitals. Both details the ordinance demands today were missing at the start.

Bern has used the bear since the 13th century. We will give a precise year for the oldest record only once we have read it in the original text. According to SRF, the oldest depictions in the chronicles had neither red claws nor genitals, two details the ordinance demands today. For the 19th century, SRF assumes the detail was often left out, and New Bern still shows it.

🇺🇸 New Bern coat of arms: the bear that came without

The Bernese arms also fly in North Carolina, and there the bear lacks one detail. New Bern received them in February 1896 from a Swiss delegation, without the genitals.

New Bern was founded in 1710 by Bernese emigrants led by Christoph von Graffenried and is the oldest of the American namesakes. According to SRF, the accompanying letter presented the arms as a symbol now shared by the Swiss and the American Bern. It was not American prudishness either: SRF assumes the version without genitals was common in Bern itself in the 19th century and was handed over as such.

💡Did you know?

Until the end of 2025 the Bernese ordinance set 26 district coats of arms. Only one showed the whole bear: Bern.

Source: BSG 105.31

🐾 Bern bear: a whole bear in one district out of 26

The bear is the canton’s heraldic animal, but until the end of 2025 only one of the ordinance’s 26 district coats of arms showed the whole bear: Bern. The eagle was more common (3 times).

Animals in the 26 district arms (version until 2025)
eagle3
bear’s paw3
lion2
whole bear1
ibex1
half bear1
crane1
All 26 district coats of arms (BSG 105.31 annex 1, until 31 December 2025)
No.DistrictAnimalBlazon (official German text)
1AarbergeagleIn Silber auf rotem Dreiberg ein auffliegender golden bewehrter und geschnabelter, rot bezungter schwarzer Adler.
3Bernwhole bearIn Rot ein goldener Schrägbalken, belegt mit einem schreitenden rot bewehrten, bezungten und gezoteten schwarzen Bären.
5Bürenbear’s pawIn Rot vom linken Schildrand eine silberne Bärentatze.
8Erlachbear’s pawIn Rot vom linken Schildrand eine schwarze Bärentatze, die eine ausgerissene grüne Erle mit goldenem Stamm hält.
10FrutigeneagleIn Silber ein golden gekrönter, bewehrter und bezungter schwarzer Adler.
16Nidaubear’s pawIn Silber vom linken Schildrand eine rote Bärentatze.
19Obersimmentalhalf bearIn Gold ein halber rot bezungter und silbern bezahnter schwarzer Bär.
21SchwarzenburglionIn Silber auf grünem Dreiberg ein steigender rot bezungter und gezoteter schwarzer Löwe.

Blazons in the official German wording: there is no English version.

The ConvivaPlus analysis of the 26 blazons counts five bear motifs: the whole bear in Bern, a half bear in Obersimmental and bear’s paws in Büren, Erlach and Nidau. 14 of the 26 arms show no animal at all, but bars, trees, keys or a castle. Since 2026 the district arms are no longer in the ordinance.

🧑‍⚖️ Protection of the Bern coat of arms: who is in charge

A dispute over the Bernese arms does not start at a regional court: civil actions under the federal Act go straight to the Commercial Court, the sole cantonal instance. For the canton, only the State Chancellery may sue.

Responsibilities under the Bernese introductory ordinance
TaskBodyBasis
Legal action over misuse of the cantonal armsState Chancellery (for the canton)BSG 105.31 Art. 5 para. 1
Legal action over misuse of municipal armsthe municipality itselfBSG 105.31 Art. 5 para. 2
Civil actions under the federal ActCommercial Court, sole cantonal instanceBSG 105.31 Art. 6
Register of municipal armsState ArchivesBSG 105.31 Art. 4 para. 3
Notification to the Institute of Intellectual PropertyState ArchivesBSG 105.31 Art. 7
Allowing continued useState ChancelleryBSG 105.31 Art. 8 para. 3

There is no office that rules on every club cup: the Act itself lists the allowed cases. If in doubt, ask the State Chancellery (cantonal arms) or the municipality (municipal arms).

🛡️ Swiss canton coats of arms: Bern is not alone

Bern is not alone with its bear: according to SRF, the Appenzell bear, the Thurgau lions, the Schaffhausen ram and the Graubünden ibex also show their animal’s genitals; only Geneva’s half eagle shows nothing. All 26 coats of arms with names, as a printable sheet and with the wording of the law, are on Swiss canton coats of arms. All 26 cantons with their arms, capital and key figures are on Cantons of Switzerland. The canton of Bern in numbers has its own page, its population is in Population of Switzerland, and the city of Bern’s place in the ranking of the largest cities in Switzerland.

📊
Quick poll

Did you know the arms of the city and the canton of Bern are different?

One click – anonymous, no sign-up required.

❓ Questions about the Bern coat of arms

The most common questions, answered from the ordinance and the federal Act.

🔍

People also ask

Related questions from our magazine

Cantons of Switzerland →
Largest cities in Switzerland →
Switzerland religion →
🏆 The ConvivaPlus verdict

The ConvivaPlus verdict

Whoever writes “identical” has not read the ordinance: canton and city of Bern differ by their crown, and until 2025 there was even a third bear. In daily life the difference between flag and arms is what counts: the flag is free, the arms belong to the public body, except at the festival, on the festival cup and in the reference book.

Sourced sentence by sentence · checked against the sources · researched with the help of artificial intelligence · How we work ›

Wojtek BernetPublished by Wojtek BernetFounder and publisher · Editorial ›
Sources & methodology5
Researched & source-checked · for Switzerland
As of: 11/13/2026
recht
01
Einführungsverordnung zur eidgenössischen Wappenschutzgesetzgebung (EV WSchG), BSG 105.31 →Arts. 3–8, version of 1 January 2026, read 13.11.2026 (official texts DE/FR)
02
BSG 105.31, version until 31 Dec 2025 with annex 1 (district arms) →official PDF of the previous version, Art. 3 para. 2 and 26 blazons, checked 13.11.2026
03
Federal Act on the Protection of the Swiss Coat of Arms (WSchG), SR 232.21 →Arts. 8 and 10, version of 1 July 2025, checked 13.11.2026; no official English version
medien
04
SRF Kultur: «Warum diesem Berner Bären sein bestes Stück fehlt» (03.10.2023) →New Bern 1710 and 1896, Bernese chronicles, checked 13.11.2026
eigen
05
ConvivaPlus Bern Arms Check and analysis of the district armsour mapping of uses to the paragraphs of the Act and count of animals from the official wording, as of 13.11.2026

All information without guarantee. Found an error? → support@conviva-plus.ch

What do you think of this article?

Found an error or have feedback? Let us know or write to us directly.

Recommendation

Make ConvivaPlus a preferred source

Pick ConvivaPlus as a preferred source in Google Search – our guides then appear higher in your Top Stories.